 |
| Image:X |
US President, Donald Trump, has lashed out at the Supreme Court of the United States after it struck down his sweeping global tariff policy in a decisive 6–3 ruling, declaring that he had exceeded his constitutional authority.
The judgment effectively dismantled one of the most aggressive trade measures of his administration, dealing a significant blow to his economic strategy.
The court held that the broad tariffs imposed on multiple countries went beyond the powers granted to the president under existing federal law.
Reacting during a press conference shortly after the ruling, Trump insisted that despite the setback, he still possesses wide-ranging authority over foreign trade and economic sanctions. In a fiery statement, he said, “I can destroy the trade. I can destroy the country.
I’m allowed to impose a foreign-destroying embargo. I can embargo. I can do anything I want, but I can’t charge one dollar.”
His remarks quickly generated backlash across political and legal circles. Critics described the comments as reckless and inflammatory, arguing that they undermined democratic institutions and constitutional checks and balances.
However, some of his supporters defended him, claiming he was merely pointing out what he views as inconsistencies in the court’s interpretation of executive powers.
Trump later took to his social media platform, Truth Social, where he praised the three justices who ruled in his favour while condemning the six who opposed his policy. Notably, two of the justices who voted against him were appointed during his presidency.
He labelled the majority as “a disgrace to our nation,” further accusing them of being influenced by political opponents and foreign interests. In another sarcastic remark, he wrote, “I wanted to be a good boy. I didn’t want to do anything that would affect the decision of the court.”
Beyond the political drama, the ruling carries serious financial implications. The federal government must now address how to refund an estimated $184 billion collected from the invalidated tariffs. Analysts note that the tariffs had already pushed up consumer prices, as importers passed the additional costs on to American buyers.
The decision is therefore expected to bring both fiscal and administrative challenges in the coming months.
Even within the Republican Party, there are growing concerns about the long-term impact of large-scale trade confrontations.
Senior party figures have previously warned that escalating tariff wars, particularly with allied nations, could strain diplomatic ties and harm domestic industries.
Despite the setback, Trump signalled that he is not retreating from his aggressive trade agenda. He announced plans to pursue a limited 10 percent global tariff under a different federal statute, suggesting that his administration remains committed to reshaping international trade relationships.
The court’s ruling marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate over presidential powers and economic policy, setting the stage for further legal and political battles in the months ahead.
#ExclusiveUpdate
#ViralContent
No comments:
Post a Comment