Uber IPO, Worst Performing Initial Public Offering In U.S. Stock Market History - Simply Entertainment Reports and Trending Stories

Breaking

Monday, May 13, 2019

Uber IPO, Worst Performing Initial Public Offering In U.S. Stock Market History

Uber IPO

Rideshare unicorn Uber doesn’t do anything small. When it was in the game of raising money, it raised close to £19.2 billion. When it loses that money – and it does every single quarter – it loses it at astronomical burn rates. It finally debuted on the New York Stock Exchange on Friday, in the middle of international trade uncertainty and following a massive, international strike by its own drivers, how’d it do?

According to University of Florida professor Jay Ritter, Uber’s 7.62 per cent decline since hitting the NYSE makes it “bigger than first day dollar losses of any prior IPO in the U.S.”

In terms of percentage losses, Uber’s dip doesn’t even scratch the surface of the worst IPOs. But the staggering valuation of the company makes it, in raw scale, “among the top 10 IPOs ever” including companies outside the U.S., Ritter told Gizmodo in a phone interview. That single digit decline resulted in an estimated £474.7 million paper losses.

Consider also that Uber’s debut valuation of £58.8 billion was a considerable drop from the between £69.2 billion and £92.3 billion the company had been worth in some analysts estimation just a month earlier – one meant to stanch the forthcoming bleeding that had begun with competitor Lyft’s bellyflop IPO. This defensive position did little to keep Uber or its investors from taking on water within a single day of trading.

According to one analyst, the company may be profitable by 2024, though its only real plan so far is to continue to screw workers and eventually replace them with unproven technology. As former CEO Travis Kalanick said in 2014, “the reason that Uber could be expensive is you’re not just paying for the car, you’re paying for the other dude in the car who’s driving”.

Presently, investors are probably realising that what they’re paying for is an unsustainable company so huge that its main justification for existing is sunk cost.


Featured photo: Spencer Platt (Getty)

Source:  gizmodo.co.uk

No comments:

Post a Comment

Post Bottom Ad